×

Warning message

The installed version of the browser you are using is outdated and no longer supported by Konveio. Please upgrade your browser to the latest release.

Town of Jackson Draft Natural Resources Overlay (NRO) Update

The updated Town NRO is available for review and comment

The Town of Jackson Draft Natural Resources Overlay (NRO) is available for review.  This update to the NRO applies only within the Town of Jackson.  

File name:

-

File size:

-

Title:

-

Author:

-

Subject:

-

Keywords:

-

Creation Date:

-

Modification Date:

-

Creator:

-

PDF Producer:

-

PDF Version:

-

Page Count:

-

Page Size:

-

Fast Web View:

-

Choose an option Alt text (alternative text) helps when people can’t see the image or when it doesn’t load.
Aim for 1-2 sentences that describe the subject, setting, or actions.
This is used for ornamental images, like borders or watermarks.
Preparing document for printing…
0%

Click anywhere in the document to add a comment. Select a bubble to view comments.

Document is loading Loading Glossary…
Powered by Konveio

Comments

View all Cancel

These also need permeability if w/in .5 mi of planned wildlife crossing
note typo - should be wildland not wildlife
in reply to Amy Kuszak's comment
We do mean to exempt "Agriculture.1.Definition. Agriculture is the farming or ranching of land. a.Includes:
i.cultivation of the soil
ii.production of forage, crops, or timber
iii.growing of ornamental or landscaping plants
iv.greenhouses
v.rearing, feeding, and management of livestock"
in reply to Amy Kuszak's comment
We did add a version of this in the mitigation section for overstory types FYI
I recommend adding the vegetation overstory types and their ranking. This may not apply on most lots in town but on larger lots it may be helpful to provide guidance on the least impactive areas to development and for avoidance of fragmentation of more valuable habitats. Inclusion in the LDR will increase the predictability of landowners and will assist planning staff in determining compliance with development standard compliance during reviews.
Add definition and measurement criteria for 'fragmentation'.
Change to shall.
Add - and migration.
Add - and migration.
How was the 1-acre threshold determined here and in other sections of the proposal?
This section should apply to any property with any amount of high-tier mapping. Allowances for demonstrating a lower-tier environmental assessment process could be included.
Yes, but all development should be permeable whenever possible.
I recommend that demonstration of wildlife permeability should be required in all tiers for all developments. Section 5.2.1.D.1.iii above should be edited to require wildlife permeability town-wide.
Agree with this exemption for current development. However, moving forward, development proposals should be required to consider the resource impacts of WUI requirements when evaluating their impacts in the Environmental Assessment.
Agree that agricultural operations should be exempt from this section, but I am concerned that Section 6.1.3 could imply that a hobby farm or personal garden qualifies for this exemption. I recommend tightening the definition of agriculture in Section 6.1.3.
Affordable housing projects should be incentivized in town, but blanket exempting the Environmental Assessment process for affordable housing projects implies that housing will be approved at any cost. I recommend revising this language to allow exemption from the Environmental Assessment process if an environmental consultant demonstrates that the project will not be detrimental to the environment and that any potential impacts will be minor relative to the community benefit.
Language should be added to identify short and long distance wildlife movement corridors as protected natural resources - avoiding the development of barriers and wildlife traps.

Recommend including this language from the county LDRs - " Designing development to protect and promote landscape permeability for wildlife is essential to maintaining viable wildlife populations both locally and state-wide. "
I believe the intention of the Focal Species Habitat Mapping was to identify the most valuable habitats - typically areas that are important to many of the focal species. The intention was not to protect a specific focal species used in the mapping, but to protect the most valuable habitats. Happy to chat if this does not make sense.
Recommend adding "and public lands".